The Fraud of Western Medical Ethics by Dr. Wu Tao-Wei You have probably heard or read about so-called "medical ethics". And the physicians of the West like to toss about this term to impress their gullible patients as well as to fool the general public. Whenever some plague virus is genetically engineered or a goat head is cloned onto an octopus body in the laboratory, or a small pox microbe is married to the toxic molecules of cobra venom, the Jewish Media announces these abominations with the sober assurance that the good doctors are also concerned with the "medical ethics" associated with these procedures. "Medical Ethics!" -- you hear the term being inserted into every announcement of a new freak-show in the laboratory. We are lulled into sleep with the promises that regardless of how gruesome or unholy these experiments are, that "medical ethics" will protect the world from anything bad. And because of "medical ethics" holding them back and keeping them Virtuous, the good doctors and scientists assure us all that their test-tube monsters won't break one of their Golden Rules of Holy Piety and Eternal Niceness. This is what they claim "medical ethics" does for them. But as Socrates and Plato taught, we cannot know what we are talking about unless we first understand the words that we are using with which to do the talking. And so, the first step toward understanding what these highly-paid practitioners of medical mumbo-jumbo are talking about, is to define the word "ethics". According to the dictionary, an "ethic" is a principle of right or good conduct. It is a system of moral principles or values. And "ethics" is the study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by the individual in his relationship with others. And, lastly, "ethics" are the rules or standards governing the conduct of the members of a profession. And so, now, anyone can go to a dictionary, look up the word "ethics" and instantly realize that the good doctors are concerned with the higher levels of human endeavor, right? Well, not exactly. This is what they WANT you to believe! But what they say and what they do, are two different things altogether. Just because the scientists and physicians talk about ethics, does not mean that they actually practice such a thing. Rather, what they practice is medical hypocrisy, lies and deceit. In the newspapers and TV, we are daily treated with great rejoicing and fanfare to the latest abominations of medical science such as the cannibalism of stem cell research, the latest abortion methods and birth-control inventions, genetic monstrosities such as cloning and the mixing of human DNA with that of animals and bacteria. The stuff of grade-B monster movies and science fiction extraterrestrial horror films, are becoming commonplace in the modern world. And in each and every announcement heralding the wonders of modern science, the smoke screen of "medical ethics" is dangled before our eyes. "Oh yes," the scientists confide, "we are concerned about the medical ethics of creating unnatural creatures and of welding human remains into the bodies of non-human species." And upon hearing this, the hypnotized public believes that there really is such a thing as "medical ethics" for the scientists to use as a moral yardstick of their criminal activities. Because the definition of "ethics" involves "right and good conduct and moral considerations", the People are being deceived that this is really what the scientists are concerned with. Like the excellent hypocrites that they are, what the physicians talk about has very little to do with what they are actually doing. After all, talk is cheap and it costs them nothing. The physicians and scientists use the words "medical ethics" like a shinny mirror that they can hide behind. The mirror reflects back the ideas and the dictionary definitions that the Public has of ethics, so that the People believe that this is what the doctors are promoting. But behind that mirror, the hunchbacked scientists in white smocks and arrogant attitudes, do whatever they want to do regardless of anything as inconvenient as Ethics. How can they do this? In the first place, all Western Medical Ethics are based solely upon the Hippocratic oath. This is like basing the foundation of your house upon sand and water balloons. Although there are various versions of the Hippocratic Oath which bind the physician from performing abortions or giving poisons, modern graduates into the American Medical Association are saved from such a bother. Today's doctors follow the AMA oath as follows: "You do solemnly swear, each by whatever he or she holds most sacred, that you will be loyal to the Profession of Medicine and just and generous to its members; that you will lead your lives and practice your art in uprightness and honor; that into whatsoever house you shall enter, it shall be for the good of the sick to the utmost of your power, your holding yourselves far aloof from wrong, from corruption, from the tempting of others to vice; that you will exercise your art solely for the cure of your patients, and will give no drug, perform no operation, for a criminal purpose, even if solicited, far less suggest it; that whatsoever you shall see or hear of the lives of men or women which is not fitting to be spoken, you will keep inviolably secret. These things do you swear. Let each bow the head in sign of acquiescence. And now, if you will be true to this, your oath, may prosperity and good repute be ever yours; the opposite, if you shall prove yourselves forsworn." In the above Oath, taken by every physician of the AMA, can you see any morals or ethics? In the first place, they swear by "whatever he or she holds most sacred". So, Satanists and Jews can become doctors since evil and money are their most "sacred" treasures. And since Jews swear to their demon-god the Kol Nidre Vow on every Yom Kippur to break all of their promises in advance for the coming year, the AMA Oath is not binding upon them at all. And so, Jewish doctors are automatically excluded from anything resembling "medical ethics". And in the abortion mills, the genetic engineering labs and the fertility clinics of today, who are the prime movers and promoters of these evils? Jews, of course! In the second place, the new doctors are not asked to be loyal to God or to a Higher Power or to any religious principles but only to be loyal to the Profession of Medicine and to donate money when asked. And the profession of medicine, as promoted by the AMA, is a profession of money-grubbing and greedy ghouls. In the third place, even thieves have a certain honor, even thieves have a certain loyalty to each other and to their profession. So, what does this oath do for doctors that it can't do for the uprightness of thieves? In the fourth place, "wrong" or "corruption" or the "tempting of others to vice" are relative terms based upon the morals of the individual member of that society. A society of felons behind bars, would have very different ideas about right and wrong than would an old maid at a bridge party. So, this American Medical Association Oath does not ask the doctor to set any new standards of morality, but merely to be less corrupt than those around him. Besides, the Oath only abjures him from tempting "others" to vice; he does not promise to not be tempted to vice, himself. And fifth, the new doctors are not required to individually accept this oath, since all they have to do (as a group) is to remain silent and merely nod their heads. And as a reward for their doctoring, they are given the holy, AMA blessing, not of going forth to save Mankind from illness, but of going forth to obtain wealth and a good reputation. And, in their best rabbinic tradition, the AMA Oath ends with a curse upon those who do not go along with the program. That's it! That is all that modern "Medical Ethics" is based upon. Those who determine the course of modern science, are the very ones who have no notions of God, of Goodness, of Holiness, of Morality, of Truth or of Ethics. Their arguments all are derived from the AMA Hippocratic Oath. So, how is it that such ones as they, are the leaders of and the determiners of "medical ethics"? Why? Because they have falsely asserted that only physicians can be determiners of "medical ethics". In fact, physicians are the least qualified for such positions because they are the most ethically depraved. Now, whenever you read about or hear the term "medical ethics", you will know that although there really is such a thing as "ethics", it is something that the physicians really don't have. It is, however, something that they want you to believe that they are concerned with, as they create monsters and monstrosities in their laboratories to the sound of lighting bolts and the flutter of bats wings. And, if you listen carefully, in the background, you can hear the shrieks of the little babies screaming in pain while the hunch-backed scientists talk and babble and gibber about their high and mighty medical ethics. High and mighty medical ethics -- it sounds good! --------------------------------------------------------- Second Publication Rights Granted as long as the following is credited: First Published in the Chinese Swaztika Newsletter, for free subscription send blank eMail to: